
![]() |
||
|
The Critic's Picks for the
2008 Oscar© Winners |
|
|
QUICK PICKS FROM THE CRITIC: Best Picture Best Director Best Actor Best Actress Best Supporting Actor Best Supporting Actress Best Animated Feature Film Best Original Screenplay Best Adapted Screenplay Best Documentary Best Foreign Language Film Best Visual Effects Best Cinematography Best Editing Best Costume Design Best Song Miscellaneous Categories |
![]() Javier Bardem plays a psychopathic killer on a bloody rampage in NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, the Critic's Pick to win the Oscar for Best Picture |
OSCAR® 2008 - A CRITIC'S PICKS FOR THE HOLLYWOOD GOLD by Edward X. Young
Submit your comments on your favorite film or performance
Read the Critic's reviews of the five nominated
films
There Will Be Oscars®
– or will there be?
The biggest surprise on Oscar® Night will be whether there even is an Oscar® Night. If the Writer’s Guild of America (WGA) continues to strike, the 80th Academy Awards® on February 24, 2008 will likely be an untelevised ceremony. The biggest question is whether anyone will care. Oscar® is in trouble; and its TV ratings are dropping. It’s all because of a crackpot scheme dreamt up by of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences® (A.M.P.A.S.) and the TV broadcasters of the award show.
Once upon a time, Oscar® nominations were announced in February; and the Academy Awards® broadcast would take place in the springtime. This gave the movie-going public ample time to see all the nominated pictures – so that on Oscar® Night, they’d have something to root for. Now nominees are announced mid-January; and awards are doled out one month later. Considering most of Hollywood’s best movies are not released until the very end of the year, it’s apparent very few people will have a chance to see all or any of the Oscar®-nominated pictures by Oscar® Night.
A.M.P.A.S. was afraid they were losing their thunder to all the other acting award shows that are now on TV. They may think they’re beating the competition; but I say they’re shooting themselves in the foot! THERE WILL BE BLOOD might win all the big awards; but will anyone care if they haven’t seen the movie?
I hope the Academy will listen to me and come to their senses. Until they do, you can trust me, Edward X.Young, your Psychic Critic, to keep you colorfully informed about all the movies you have or have not seen. If there is no televised Oscar® broadcast on February 24, you’ll still have the HollywoodGold website on SentinelSource to keep the Academy Awards® exciting and fun!
Enjoy my movie reviews and take heed of my Oscar® picks and predictions! Don’t forget to enter all the free contests! Please post a Movie Forum comment, because it’s your chance to be a critic, too!
BEST PICTURE:
JUNO
(pictured left),
the
quirky comedy about
teen pregnancy, may have won the public heart, because it’s the only movie
nominated for Best Picture that
doesn’t feature throats slashed, innocents
unjustly accused, poison
injected, cars blown up, skulls smashed by a
captive bolt air gun, or brains beaten out with a bowling pin.
ATONEMENT may
score points with the Academy’s voting members, because it’s one of those
oh-so-British tea-and-crumpets movies (like
THE ENGLISH
PATIENT) that
always appeals to those A.M.P.A.S. anglophiles. A good friend of mine, who’s
a long-time member of the Screen Actors Guild, assures me that the
legal-thriller
MICHAEL
CLAYTON will
win, because it’s got everything (charismatic star, stellar supporting cast,
dynamic direction, and a story that never stalls in which good triumphs over
evil) that goes into the formula for a perfect Hollywood hit; and although
it may be just a genre movie, like last year’s
Oscar®-winner
THE DEPARTED, it’s
a great genre movie that could very well be the dark horse.
Regardless, this critic says it’s a dead-heat race between two darker and more sinister pictures both rooted in a moral wasteland in a desolate American West that each copped eight Oscar® nominations. Although the over-long THERE WILL BE BLOOD is brilliantly executed, I think it’s more of an individual character study on an evil oil man than a conventional narrative – and too much of an “art film” to capture a wide appeal. Whereas NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN (pictured right), as brooding and bloody as it may be, is a bona fide classic with unforgettable iconic characters; it’s the best elegiac western since the late Sam Peckinpah was behind a camera – and it’s the Critic’s Pick and Prediction to win the Hollywood Gold.
BEST
DIRECTOR:
The Critic’s Pick is
Julian
Schnabel
(pictured left) for
LE
SCAPHANDRE ET LE PAPILLION
(translated:
THE DIVING
BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY).
I can’t believe that the country of France didn’t submit this picture to the
Academy as their official entry for Oscar’s® Best Foreign Language Film; but
I imagine that’s probably because the director isn’t French; he’s an
American from New York City working abroad. This remarkable film is based
on a true story adapted from the autobiography of Jean-Dominique Bauby the
Editor of Elle Magazine, who at the age of 43 is left nearly completely
paralyzed by a massive stroke; and the only thing he can move is his left
eye. Against seemingly impossible odds, Bauby learns to communicate and
compose his memoir solely by blinking that eye. Facing a seemingly
impossible task of telling the story cinematically, director
Schnabel makes
a daring choice to film nearly the entire story in the style of
cinéma vérité
from the eye’s point of view! The result is terrifying, claustrophobic,
dream-like, and ultimately exhilarating – a
testament to the triumph of the
soul of an artist made by
Schnabel,
who’s actually a fine artist-turned-filmmaker.
However, I think the odds are slim that the Academy would give this award to a Hollywood outsider who directed a film in a foreign language. The showdown is between The Coen Brothers (pictured right) and Paul Thomas Anderson. Since THERE WILL BE BLOOD is not as entertaining as Anderson’s early masterpiece BOOGIE NIGHTS (a film he has yet to equal), the Critic Predicts that Joel & Ethan Coen will win the Hollywood Gold for NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, because it’s the best directing they’ve ever done. It’s so refreshing that the Dynamic Duo of Alternative Cinema found the confidence to set aside their kooky trademark characters and self-conscious directorial tricks. When they decided to just tell a story, they tell it magnificently.
BEST ACTOR:
The Critic’s Pick is Viggo Mortensen
(pictured left) for EASTERN PROMISES in
which he plays a Vory V Zakone (translated as “Thief in Law”) a
made-member of the ruthlessly violent Russian criminal brotherhood that has
infiltrated the West. Covered with mysterious tattoos of stars and
religious motifs that symbolically recount a litany of crimes and a history
of violence, Mortensen’s laconic Nikolai presents an outward charm
and congeniality like a wall of translucent glass that barely masks a beast
within. Mortensen plays his subtext-driven rendition like a
Matryoshka doll, in that unexpected character dimensions are revealed in
each successive scene. Although I don’t expect Mortensen to win this
award, I’m pleased this Oscar® nomination has brought greater attention to this important
film directed by David Cronenberg that’s a gritty and gruesome exposé
of a real and dangerous criminal subculture that has for too long remained
in the shadows.
The Critic Predicts that Daniel Day-Lewis (pictured right) will win the Hollywood Gold for his rendition of the incrementally corrupted oil tycoon Daniel Plainview in THERE WILL BE BLOOD. It’s an epic level performance in a performance-dominated epic film. Although apparently inspired by John Huston’s portrayal of the profligate water magnate Noah Cross in CHINATOWN (1974) it’s not an imitation but a deeper examination of a common theme. With such a rich and challenging role, it’s obvious that Day-Lewis must have had an actor’s field day as he gets the chance in this 2 hour and 38 minute picture to showcase the full range of his acting ability, creating a memorable character that is monstrous and pitiable, mythic and human.
BEST ACTRESS:
In this category, Cate Blanchett
(pictured left) has made her mark in Oscar®
history, holding the unique distinction of being nominated for two different
performances in separate categories (Best Actress in a Leading Role and Best
Actress in a Supporting Role) in the same year, while at the same time also
being nominated for the second time for playing the same character in two
different films in different years, having received Oscar®
nods for
playing England’s Queen Elizabeth I in ELIZABETH (1998) and again in
ELIZABETH: THE GOLDEN AGE this year. Alas for Cate, as great
as she is in the part, A.M.P.A.S. is likely to hold off on giving her the
Hollywood Gold for playing the Virgin Queen until she makes her final take
in the historical series.
This year the Critic Picks Marion Cotillard for her majestic
rendition of the legendary Parisian songbird Edith Piaf in
LA MOME (aka
LA VIE
EN ROSE)
which follows the singer’s extraordinary life from her ugly teenage years in
brothels to her glamorous heyday in concert halls to her tragic death,
dissipated and cancer-stricken at 47. Although this role, which required
impeccable singing talent as well as an expansive acting range, is head and
shoulders above any other performance this year, it is in French, which
makes this Critic Predict that the Academy will instead go with sentimental
favorite Julie Christie (pictured right) for her performance in AWAY FROM HER
in which she plays an Alzheimer’s victim who has completely forgotten that
she has been happily married for over 40 years. The elegant and luminous
screen legend Christie does succeed in transforming an afflicted
character that could have been tragic and depressing into a thing of beauty
that’s vibrant and surprisingly life-affirming – and she deserves merit for
that.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR:
It’s hard to believe that after all the incredible film roles he has played
over a busy career spanning nearly half a century that 82-year-old Hal
Holbrook has received his first Oscar®
nomination ever for his performance in INTO THE WILD; and if it were
any other year, this critic would say Hal stood an excellent chance,
considering A.M.P.A.S. typically reserves this category to honor veteran
actors for lifetime achievement. Unfortunately for Hal, it’s no
contest, because NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN has it in a lock. It’s
the Critic’s Pick and Prediction that
Javier Bardem
(pictured left) will make a clean getaway with this Hollywood Gold for his
creation of an iconic screen villain. He’s
a demon in black denim with a Johnny Ramone hair-do, who’s armed with a
captive bolt air gun (a device used to kill animals in a slaughterhouse),
who’s even scarier than Hannibal Lecter. Just wait for the Halloween costume
next year!
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS:
Like Hal Holbrook, 83-year-old Ruby Dee is a sentimental favorite.
Her professional career in movies stretches back to 1939 – almost 70 years!
And the nod she got for playing the mobster’s mom in AMERICAN GANGSTER
is her first Oscar®
nomination ever. Regardless, Ruby must concede to Cate Blanchett
(pictured right),
who won’t win it for playing a Queen of England, but will get the gold for
her portrayal of a “king” of popular music in I’M NOT THERE, director
Todd Haynes’ bizarre and brilliant biopic of Bob Dylan. That’s right,
Cate Blanchett plays Bob Dylan! Or to be precise, she is one of six
performers (including the ill-fated Heath Ledger) to play ever-evolving
personas of legendary Dylan over the course of his illustrious career. But
Blanchett’s amazing androgynous rendition is the best – and the
Critic’s Pick and Prediction to win the Oscar®.
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM:
What were they thinking when they failed to nominate THE SIMPSON’S MOVIE?
Perhaps they were offended by Bart’s full frontal nudity. (I’m not
kidding!) SURF’S UP which is about penguins hanging ten
doesn’t stand a snowballs chance, since that other penguin cartoon, already
won last year. RATATOUILLE, featuring gormandizing rodents
with a taste for gourmet food, was made by Brad Bird (the
genius who gave us THE INCREDIBLES), who has a lot of Hollywood
clout. However, the Critic Picks and Predicts that PERSEPOLIS
(pictured left) will
prevail. This French language film (featuring the voice of Catherine
Deneuve) is too remarkable to ignore. Based on the graphic novel by
Marjane Satrapi, who also co-directed and co-scripted PERSEPOLIS,
it’s an eye-opening autobiographical account of an outspoken
woman growing up in Iran. Representing a revolutionary leap forward in the
art form, this animated feature (which is not a kid’s movie) presents a
thought-provoking personal perspective on the Muslim world.
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY:
29-year-old Diablo Cody (pictured right), the stripper-turned-screenwriter who wrote
JUNO, is the Critic’s Pick and Prediction to win this award. This
winsome sleeper hit about teen pregnancy is so funny, poignant and clever
(and stands so far above the competition) that it’s hard to believe it was
written by a first-timer! When did she find the time to hone her craft?
Was she reading William Goldman between sets at the go-go bar?
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY:
This Oscar®
race is a dead heat that’s too close to call. The two obvious front runners
are Joel & Ethan Coen (pictured left) for NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN and Paul
Thomas Anderson for THERE WILL BE BLOOD. The deciding factor
will be how exactly the Academy’s voting members define what is a “Best
Adapted Screenplay.” The Coens scripted a very faithful translation
of Cormac McCarthy’s
“Southern Gothic”
novel.
Anderson
only very loosely based his script on Upton Sinclair’s story – and instead
created something that’s new, different and even better. It’s a coin toss.
My knowledge of Hollywood politics makes me think they won’t let
Anderson
walk away empty-handed if the
Coens
get the Hollywood Gold for directing. So the Critic Picks
NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN but Predicts that
THERE WILL BE BLOOD
will win this Academy Award®.
BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE:
Normally I can’t stand Michael Moore
(pictured right) because I maintain that he
doesn’t make documentaries; rather, he makes propaganda films that violate
ever rule in the textbook of proper documentary filmmaking. Moore is
an editorialist who decides on an advance agenda before he ever pulls the
trigger on a camera – and then pulls every dirty trick in the book to prove
his premise. Nevertheless, never have his manipulative skills been so
warranted. In taking on the lying, cheating, and oh-so-powerful providers
of so-called “health
care” in the United States as controlled by profit-oriented health
maintenance organizations (HMOs) somebody had to pull a few rabbit punches.
Because Moore’s new film SiCKO is such an urgent wake-up call,
this Critic Picks, Predicts and enthusiastically urges the Academy to give
SiCKO an Oscar®.
BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM:
A
virtually impossible category to predict, because of the five nominated
foreign language features, only one film (the Israeli entry
BEAUFORT) has even been released in the USA – and that was only days
before the Oscar®
nominations were announced. Two of these other features will not be
commercially released until after the Academy Awards®; and two others may never be screened in US movie houses.
So how is one to judge what one has not seen? On the director’s reputation
alone, this Critic Picks and Predicts that
KATYN, the entry from
Poland, will win the
Oscar®, because it’s directed by 81-year-old
Andrzej Wajda (pictured left),
who is regarded as the greatest filmmaker in the history of his country.
This brilliant artist is also a courageous freedom fighter who has put his
career and life on the line with earlier films like ASHES AND DIAMONDS
(1958), MAN OF MARBLE (1977), and MAN OF IRON (1981), all
pictures in which Wajda dared to challenge and criticize Poland’s
Soviet oppressors. I can only assume that his latest effort is likewise a
work of beauty and social relevance.
BEST VISUAL EFFECTS:
PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: AT THE WORLD’S END
looks like they spent $200 million on Computer Graphic Imaging (CGI) and
about $1.98 on its stupid screenplay. THE GOLDEN COMPASS, starring
Nicole Kidman, has impressive effects, but a thinly veiled anti-Christian
pro-pagan agenda that’s patently obvious to anyone who read the book by the
militant atheist writer of Children’s stories, Phillip Pullman. (And I
thought Nicole Kidman gave up Scientology when she divorced Tom Cruise!)
Therefore the Critic Picks and Predicts and hopes to God that
TRANSFORMERS (pictured right), the movie based on the Hasbro action figures, will win the
Hollywood Gold. It may just be a kid’s movie; but it’s one heck of a wildly
entertaining kid’s movie – and its state-of-the-art effects are really
wicked cool! But what else can you expect from TRANSFORMERS executive
producer Steven Spielberg?
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY:
In
LE SCAPHANDRE
ET LE PAPILLION
(THE
DIVING BELL AND THE BUTTERFLY)
(pictured left),
an
ingeniously executed introspective biographical picture told from the
internal viewpoint of a paralyzed man’s left eye, the camerawork is even
more expressive than the accomplished actors. It’s an astounding effort
from Janusz Kaminski, who is regarded by many as the world’s greatest
cinematographer. Spielberg uses him all the time; and he won Oscars® for
SAVING
PRIVATE RYAN and
SCHINDLER’S LIST. The
Critic Picks and Predicts he’s getting a third statuette.
BEST EDITING:
Those
Coen
Brothers
(pictured right) sure know how to cut a film too! In
NO COUNTRY
FOR OLD MEN,
not only do they know how to build tension when necessary by picking up the
pace, but they also know when to slow down for contemplative moments – or
even not cut at all to hold the drama. In their editing, they reveal
confidence and understanding of cinematic expression that even exceeds their
talents as writers and directors. Not only does this Critic Pick and
Predict them to win this award, but also suggests that A.M.P.A.S. should
invent a new category just for these guys: Best All Around Versatile
Artists In Every Aspect of Filmmaking.
BEST COSTUME
DESIGN:
Featuring snappy Stephen Sondheim tunes and more graphic
throat-slashing than any picture I can remember, director Tim Burton’s
loving tribute to Hammer Films,
SWEENEY TODD:
THE DEMON BARBER OF FLEET STREET
(pictured left) is a bloody good show that deserved far more Oscar® attention than it got.
Unfortunately, the Academy seldom embraces horror movies or musicals these
days – and this one is both. (There Will Be Blood -- and Singing!)
Nevertheless it can’t be denied that Burton always has the wildest and
woolliest costumes; and his regular designer
Colleen
Atwood is the
Critic’s Pick and Prediction to win this award.
BEST
SONG:
Walt Disney Pictures’ delightful self-parody,
ENCHANTED, has
three nominations in this field which may indicate an edge. Nevertheless,
the Critic’s Pick and Prediction is that the Oscar® will go to
“Falling
Slowly”
from
ONCE
(pictured right) starring
Glen Hansard
(of the Irish band The Frames). Think back to the scene where the duo
first sing the tune in the music store; and I dare you not to be swept away
with emotion. Add to the fact that
Hansard
is the must-have guest at private dinner parties in Hollywood for
after-dinner sing-alongs, and then you’ve got as close to a sure thing in this
category as you can get.
STREET
will win for
BEST ART
DIRECTION.
The
BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT
will be
THE TONTO
WOMAN.
The
BEST ANIMATED SHORT
will be
I MET THE
WALRUS.
The Oscar® for
BEST ORIGINAL
MUSICAL SCORE
will go to
James Newton
Howard
for
MICHAEL CLAYTON;
Howard
was
formerly of the band Toto and now holds the reputation of being the
fastest and most reliable film composer in Hollywood. The
BEST
DOCUMENTARY SHORT SUBJECT
will be
FREEHELD,
the powerful New Jersey-made film about a terminally ill woman fighting for
the legal right to leave her property to her long-time gay companion.
Because sound mixer
Kevin
O’Connell
(pictured left) holds the record for having the most Oscar® nominations without a win (20
times!), the Critic thinks it would be too cruel not to finally give him and
his team the Academy Award® for
BEST SOUND
for
TRANSFORMERS,
which should also take the Hollywood Gold for
BEST SOUND
EDITING.
Submit your comments on your favorite film or performance
Read the Critic's reviews of the five nominated
films